The study functionally characterizes three tomato CNR/FWL proteins (SlFWL2, SlFWL4, SlFWL5) and demonstrates that SlFWL5 localizes to plasmodesmata, where it regulates leaf size and morphology by promoting cell expansion likely through cell‑to‑cell communication. Gain‑ and loss‑of‑function transgenic tomato lines reveal that SlFWL5 is a key regulator of organ growth via modulation of plasmodesmatal signaling.
The study investigates the Arabidopsis ribosomal protein RPS6A and its role in auxin‑related root growth, revealing that rps6a mutants display shortened primary roots, fewer lateral roots, and defective vasculature that are not rescued by exogenous auxin. Cell biological observations and global transcriptome profiling show weakened auxin signaling and reduced levels of PIN auxin transporters in the mutant, indicating a non‑canonical function of the ribosomal subunit in auxin pathways.
The study develops an updated genome-scale metabolic model of tomato leaf (CBZ_iSL3433) incorporating carbamazepine (CBZ) transformation reactions to simulate the pollutant's stress impact under phototrophic conditions. Constraint-based analysis predicts significant reductions in biomass and altered fluxes in nutrient assimilation and secondary metabolism, which are largely ameliorated by biostimulants such as proline, spermine, glycerol, and ethanol. This framework demonstrates a systems-level approach for screening strategies to mitigate pharmaceutical pollutant stress in crops.
Transcriptome responses of two Halophila stipulacea seagrass populations from pristine and impacted habitats, to single and combined thermal and excess nutrient stressors, reveal local adaptive features and core stress-response genes
Authors: Nguyen, H. M., Yaakov, B., Beca-Carretero, P., Procaccini, G., Wang, G., Dassanayake, M., Winters, G., Barak, S.
The study examined transcriptomic responses of the tropical seagrass Halophila stipulacea from a pristine and an impacted site under single and combined thermal and excess nutrient stress in mesocosms. Combined stress caused greater gene reprogramming than individual stresses, with thermal effects dominating and the impacted population showing reduced plasticity but higher resilience. Core stress‑response genes were identified as potential early field indicators of environmental stress.